4.3 Article

Constitutive and dynamic phosphorylation and acetylation sites on NUCKS, a hypermodified nuclear protein, studied by quantitative proteomics

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22104

关键词

NUCKS; HMG protein; breast cancer; phosphorylation; acetylation; formylation; liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; quantitative proteomics; SILAC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nuclear ubiquitous casein and cyclin-dependent kinases substrate (NUCKS) is a 27 kDa chromosomal protein of unknown function. Its amino acid composition as well as the structure of its DNA binding domain resembles that of high mobility group A (HMGA) proteins, chromosomal proteins known as modulators of chromatin conformation and regulators of transcription. Conformation and function of the HMGA proteins are regulated by phosphorylation and acetylation. So far 19 phosphorylation sites had been reported in NUCKS. In this study, we have identified all known and six additional phosphorylation sites, and also mapped multiple sites of acetylation, methylation and formylation. We measured cell cycle dependent changes of phosphorylation and acetylation of NUCKS in HeLa cells through stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC), using the dephosphorylated protein for normalization. We identified sites that were highly phosphorylated or dephosphorylated in mitotically arrested cells as well as sites that were constitutively phosphorylated. The extent of acetylation is reduced in mitotically and G1 arrested cells. Analysis of human cancer specimens revealed that in tissues the extent of acetylation, formylation and methylation is higher than in cultured cells. In breast cancer samples, seven acetylation, three methylation, and three formylation sites were mapped in NUCKS. Of the 243 amino acids, at least 36 can be modified with a total of 57 posttranslational modifications. Thus, NUCKS appears to have the highest ratio of modified to unmodified residues of any protein so far described.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据