4.6 Article

Familial secondary erythrocytosis due to increased oxygen affinity is caused by destabilization of the T state of hemoglobin Brigham (a2ß2Pro100Leu)

期刊

PROTEIN SCIENCE
卷 21, 期 10, 页码 1444-1455

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pro.2130

关键词

hemoglobin; allostery; kinetics; ligand binding

资金

  1. Food and Drug Administration (MODSCI)
  2. Oak Ridge Institute for Science Education
  3. National Institutes of Health [HL47020, GM35649]
  4. Welch [C-0612]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hemoglobin Brigham (beta Pro100 to Leu) was first reported in a patient with familial erythrocytosis. Erythrocytes of an affected individual from the same family contain both HbA and Hb Brigham and exhibit elevated O2 affinity compared with normal cells (P50 = 23 mm Hg vs. 31 mmHg at pH 7.4 at 37 degrees C). O2 affinities measured for hemolysates were sensitive to changes in pH or chloride concentrations, indicating little change in the Bohr and Chloride effects. Hb Brigham was separated from normal HbA by nondenaturing cation exchange liquid chromatography, and the amino acid substitution was verified by mass spectrometry. The properties of Hb Brigham isolated from the patient's blood were then compared with those of recombinant Hb Brigham expressed in Escherichia coli. Kinetic experiments suggest that the rate constants for ligand binding and release in the high (R) and low (T) affinity quaternary states of Hb Brigham are similar to those of native hemoglobin. However, the Brigham mutation decreases the T to R equilibrium constant (L) which accelerates the switch to the R state during ligand binding to deoxy-Hb, increasing the rate of association by approximately twofold, and decelerates the switch during ligand dissociation from HbO2, decreasing the rate approximately twofold. These kinetic data help explain the high O2 affinity characteristics of Hb Brigham and provide further evidence for the importance of the contribution of Pro100 to intersubunit contacts and stabilization of the T quaternary structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据