4.6 Article

Sonication of proteins causes formation of aggregates that resemble amyloid

期刊

PROTEIN SCIENCE
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 3017-3027

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1110/ps.04831804

关键词

sonication; ultrasound radiation; amyloid; fibrils; protein aggregation; beta-structure; protein conforniational disorder; protein misfolding

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the widespread use of sonication in medicine, industry, and research, the effects of sonication on proteins remain poorly characterized. We report that sonication of a range of structurally diverse proteins results in the formation of aggregates that have similarities to amyloid aggregates. The formation of amyloid is associated with, and has been implicated in, causing of a wide range of protein conformational disorders including Alzheimer's disease, Huntington's disease, Parkinson's disease, and prion diseases. The aggregates cause large enhancements in fluorescence of the dye thioflavin T, exhibit green-gold birefringence upon binding the dye Congo red, and cause a red-shift in the absorbance spectrum of Congo red. In addition, circular dichroism reveals that sonication-induced aggregates have high beta-content, and proteins with significant native alpha-helical structure show increased beta-structure in the aggregates. Ultrastructural analysis by electron microscopy reveals a range of morphologies for the sonication-induced aggregates, including fibrils with diameters of 5-20 nm. The addition of preformed aggregates to unsonicated protein solutions results in accelerated and enhanced formation of additional aggregates upon heating. The dye-binding and structural characteristics, as well as the ability of the sonication-induced aggregates to seed the formation of new aggregates are all similar to the properties of amyloid. These results have important implications for the use of sonication in food, biotechnological and medical applications, and for research on protein aggregation and conformational disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据