4.2 Article

Expression analysis of human p-secretase in transgenic tomato fruits

期刊

PROTEIN EXPRESSION AND PURIFICATION
卷 82, 期 1, 页码 125-131

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.pep.2011.11.012

关键词

Alzheimer's vaccine; beta-Secretase; Recombinant protein; Lycopersicon esculentum; Transgenic plant

资金

  1. Korea Research Institute of Bioscience & Biotechnology (KRIBB)
  2. Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An emerging strategy in biomanufacturing involves using transgenic plants to express recombinant pharmaceutical and industrial proteins in large quantities. beta-Site APP cleaving enzyme 1 (beta-secretase 1, BACE1) is an enzyme involved in the abnormal production of A beta 42, the major component of senile plaques in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Thus, BACE1 represents a key target protein in the development of new potential drugs to treat Alzheimer's disease. We aimed to develop a tomato-derived recombinant BACE1 (rBACE1) protein to serve as a vaccine antigen that would promote an immune response. We utilized a plant expression cassette, pE8BACE, to optimize BACE1 expression in tomato fruits. Polyemerase chain reaction and Southern blot analyses verified integration of the BACE1 gene into the plant genome. Northern and Western blot analyses demonstrated successful mRNA and protein expression of rBACE1, respectively; the Sensizyme assay kit estimated the expression level of rBACE1 protein at 136 +/- 7 ng mg(-1) total soluble protein. The tomato-derived rBACE1 retains its activity for a long storage period at cool or room temperature, and is highly resistant to degradation in conditions such as low acidity. Tomato-derived rBACE1 was severely degraded by heat or boiling. The proteolytic activity of tomato-derived rBACE1, confirmed by fluorescence resonance transfer assay, was similar to that of a commercial sample of Escherichia colt-derived BACE1. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据