4.2 Article

Improved expression of Rhizopus oryzae α-amylase in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris

期刊

PROTEIN EXPRESSION AND PURIFICATION
卷 79, 期 1, 页码 142-148

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.pep.2011.05.007

关键词

alpha-Amylase; Rhizopus oryzae; Pichia pastoris; Promoter; Signal sequence; Protein

资金

  1. Chinese Science and Technology Support Research for the 11th 5-year Plan Program [2009DFA31300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In our previous study, the alpha-amylase from Rhizopus oryzae (RoAmy) was expressed in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae but the obtained recombinant RoAmy (rRoAmy) yields were too low. The aim of the present research was to obtain high-level expressions of RoAmy in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. To this end, we constructed P. pastoris strains with the capability to express recombinant alpha-amylase under the control of constitutive glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAP) and methanol-inducible alcohol oxidase 1 promoters. The levels of inducibly expressed rRoAmy were higher than those of constitutively expressed. The maximal inducible rRoAmy expression levels for the Mut(+) strains (41.1 mg/l) were approximately eight times higher than those for the Mut(s) strains and 24 times higher than those expressed under the control of the GAP promoter. For both inducible and constitutive expressions, the S. cerevisiae a-prepro sequence and the native signal sequence of RoAmy were used separately to direct the secretion of rRoAmy into the culture medium of P. pastoris. Low levels of intracellular amylase activities that had been detected after shake-flask fermentation indicated that both signal sequences could effectively direct the secretion of rRoAmy under all studied conditions. In addition, the secretion levels of rRoAmy directed with its own signal peptide were 7-10% higher than those directed by the alpha-prepro sequence. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据