4.2 Article

Expression, purification and characterization of two thermostable endoglucanases cloned from a lignocellulosic decomposing fungi Aspergillus fumigatus Z5 isolated from compost

期刊

PROTEIN EXPRESSION AND PURIFICATION
卷 79, 期 2, 页码 176-186

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.pep.2011.06.008

关键词

Aspergillus fumigatus; Endoglucanase; Pichia pastoris; Thermostable; SDS-PAGE; Zymogram

资金

  1. Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology [2011CB100503]
  2. Agricultural Ministry of China [201103004]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [KYZ201003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two genes encoding endoglucanase, designated as eg12 and eg13, were cloned from a lignocellulosic decomposing fungus Aspergillus fumigatus Z5 and were successfully expressed in Pichia pastoris X33. The deduced amino acid sequences encoded by eg12 and eg13 showed strong similarity with the sequence of glycoside hydrolase family 5. SDS-PAGE and western blot assays indicated that the recombinant enzymes were secreted into the culture medium and the zymogram analysis confirmed that both recombinant enzymes had endoglucanase activity. Several biochemical properties of the two recombinant enzymes were studied: Eg12 and Eg13 showed optimal activity at pH 5.0 and 4.0, respectively, and at 50 and 60 degrees C, respectively. Eg12 and Eg13 showed good pH stability in the range of 4-7, and both enzymes demonstrated good thermostability ranging from 30 to 60 degrees C. The K(m) and V(max) values using carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC, soluble cellulose, polymerized by beta-1, 4-linked glucose residues) as the substrate at optimal conditions were determined. The activities of the enzymes on a variety of cello-oligosaccharide substrates were investigated, and Eg12 can hydrolyze cellotetraose and cellopentaose but not cellobiose and cellotriose, whereas Eg13 can hydrolyze all cello-oligosaccharides, except cellobiose. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据