4.1 Article

Tuning the serum persistence of human serum albumin domain III: diabody fusion proteins

期刊

PROTEIN ENGINEERING DESIGN & SELECTION
卷 23, 期 10, 页码 789-798

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/protein/gzq054

关键词

blood clearance; FcRn; HSA DIII; PET imaging; protein scaffold

资金

  1. SNM [0708pmi]
  2. ICMIC [NIH CA086306]
  3. National Institute of Health [PO1 CA43904, CA33572]
  4. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA033572, R24CA092865, P30CA016042, P01CA043904, P50CA086306] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [S10RR016793] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The long circulation persistence of human serum albumin (HSA) is enabled by its domain III (DIII) interaction with the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn). A protein scaffold based on HSA DIII was designed. To modify the serum half life of the scaffold, residues H535, H510, and H464 were individually mutated to alanine. HSA DIII wild type (WT) and variants were fused to the anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) T84.66 diabody (Db), radiolabeled with I-124 and injected into xenografted athymic mice for serial PET/CT imaging. All proteins targeted the CEA-positive tumor. The mean residence times (MRT) of the proteins, calculated by quantifying blood activity from the PET images, were: Db-DIII WT (56.7 h), H535A (25 h), H510A (20 h), H464A (17 h), compared with Db (2.9 h). Biodistribution confirmed the order of blood clearance from slow to fast: Db-DIII WT > H535A > H510A > H464A > Db with 4.0, 2.0, 1.8, 1.6 and 0.08 %ID/g of remaining blood activity at 51 h, respectively. This study demonstrates that attenuating the DIII-FcRn interaction provides a way of controlling the pharmacokinetics of the entire Db-DIII fusion protein without compromising tumor targeting. H464 appears to be most crucial for FcRn binding (greatest reduction in MRT), followed by H510 and H535. By mutating the DIII scaffold, we can dial serum kinetics for imaging or therapy applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据