4.1 Article

Structure-function studies of an engineered scaffold protein derived from stefin A. I: Development of the SQM variant

期刊

PROTEIN ENGINEERING DESIGN & SELECTION
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 403-413

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/protein/gzq012

关键词

circular dichroism spectroscopy; epitope recognition; peptide aptamer; scaffold protein

资金

  1. BBSRC [BB/F011296/1]
  2. Leukaemia Research Fund
  3. AstraZeneca
  4. White Rose Health Innovation
  5. BBSRC [BB/F011296/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. MRC [MC_U105359876] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F011296/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Medical Research Council [MC_U105359876] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-antibody scaffold proteins are used for a range of applications, especially the assessment of protein-protein interactions within human cells. The search for a versatile, robust and biologically neutral scaffold previously led us to design STM (stefin A triple mutant), a scaffold derived from the intracellular protease inhibitor stefin A. Here, we describe five new STM-based scaffold proteins that contain modifications designed to further improve the versatility of our scaffold. In a step-by-step approach, we introduced restriction sites in the STM open reading frame that generated new peptide insertion sites in loop 1, loop 2 and the N-terminus of the scaffold protein. A second restriction site in 'loop 2' allows substitution of the native loop 2 sequence with alternative oligopeptides. None of the amino acid changes interfered significantly with the folding of the STM variants as assessed by circular dichroism spectroscopy. Of the five scaffold variants tested, one (stefin A quadruple mutant, SQM) was chosen as a versatile, stable scaffold. The insertion of epitope tags at varying positions showed that inserts into loop 1, attempted here for the first time, were generally well tolerated. However, N-terminal insertions of epitope tags in SQM had a detrimental effect on protein expression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据