4.7 Article

Grain boundary-slip bands interactions: Impact on the fatigue crack initiation in a polycrystalline forged Ni-based superalloy

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 325-336

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.009

关键词

Fatigue crack initiation; Grain boundaries slip transmission; Localized plasticity; EBSD; Ni-based superalloys

资金

  1. SAFRAN-Turbomeca

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Low cycle fatigue properties of polycrystalline gamma-gamma' Ni-based superalloys are dependent on many factors such as temperature, environment, grain size and distribution of the strengthening phases. Under LCF conditions, an intergranular crack initiation is often observed. The local conditions favoring such a damage mode are analyzed in this paper considering the high strength cast and wrought Udimet (TM) 720Li alloy tested at room temperature. Tensile and fatigue tests were performed on samples having two different microstructures with various gamma' precipitates distributions. The objective is to focus on the plasticity and damage processes developed near grain boundaries. A special attention was paid on the slip transfer between neighboring grains taking into account the local crystallographic orientations. In some specific crystallographic configurations (linked to geometrical considerations between slip planes activated on both side of the grain boundary), a localized crystallographic rotation was detected within very small volumes confined at the tip of slip bands developed in the neighboring grain. Although limited in size (similar to 30 mu m(3)), these micro-volumes are associated to an intense elastic/plastic activity resulting from very high local stresses due to the elastic rotations. The development of such specific zones was investigated at different stages of the monotonic and cyclic behavior at room temperature and was identified as favoring micro-cracks initiation. (C) 2015 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据