4.6 Article

Effects of Si Addition and Long-Term Thermal Exposure on the Tensile Properties of a Ni-Mo-Cr Superalloy

期刊

ACTA METALLURGICA SINICA-ENGLISH LETTERS
卷 28, 期 8, 页码 951-957

出版社

CHINESE ACAD SCIENCES, INST METAL RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1007/s40195-015-0277-x

关键词

Ni-Cr-Mo; Silicon; Carbides; Mechanical properties

资金

  1. program of International S&T Cooperation, ANSTO-SINAP [2014DFG60230]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51371188]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA02004210]
  4. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [11JC1414900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of long-term thermal exposure on the grain boundary carbides and the tensile behavior of two kinds of Ni-Mo-Cr superalloys with different silicon contents (0 and 0.46 wt%) was investigated. Experimental results showed granular M2C carbides formed at the grain boundaries after exposure for 100 h for the non-silicon alloy. Furthermore, these fine granular M2C carbides will transform into plate-like M6C carbides as exposure time increases. For the Si-containing alloys, only the granular M6C carbides formed at the grain boundaries during the whole exposure time. The coarsening of the grain boundary carbides occurred in both alloys with increasing exposure time. In addition, the coarsening kinetics of the grain boundary carbides for the non-silicon alloy is faster than that of the standard alloy. The tensile properties of both alloys are improved after exposure for 100 h due to the formation of nano-sized grain boundary carbides. The grain boundary carbides are coarsened more seriously for non-silicon alloys than that of Si-containing alloys, resulting in a more significant decrease in the tensile strength and elongation for the former case. Silicon additions can effectively inhibit the severe coarsening of the grain boundary carbides and thus avoid the obvious deterioration of the tensile properties after a long-term thermal exposure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据