4.5 Article

Systemic inflammation and survival of patients with prostate cancer: evidence from the Glasgow Inflammation Outcome Study

期刊

PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 195-201

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2011.60

关键词

mGPS; NLR; prognosis; Gleason grade; systemic inflammation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: There is some evidence that systemic inflammation may be associated with survival in patients with prostate cancer; however, it is unclear whether this is independent of grade. We therefore investigated the role of inflammation-based prognostic scores, the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and their associations with Gleason grade in patients with prostate cancer. METHODS: Patients from a cohort, the Glasgow Inflammation Outcome Study, who had diagnosis of prostate cancer, were included in this study. The mGPS was constructed by combining C-reactive protein and albumin whereas NLR by calculating the ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes. We estimated 5-year relative survival and relative excess risk (RER) of death by mGPS and NLR categories after adjusting for age, socioeconomic circumstances and Gleason grade. RESULTS: In all, 897 prostate cancer patients were identified; of those 422 (47%) died during a maximum follow-up of 6.2 years. Systemic inflammation appeared to have significant prognostic value. The mGPS predicted poorer 5-year overall and relative survival independent of age, socioeconomic circumstances, disease grade and NLR. Raised mGPS also had a significant association with excess risk of death (mGPS 2: RER = 2.41, 95% confidence interval 1.37-4.23) among aggressive, clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason grades 8-10). CONCLUSIONS: The mGPS is a strong measure of systemic inflammation, when compared with NLR. Prostate cancer patients with a raised mGPS had significantly higher risk of death for overall as well high-grade disease. Inflammation-based prognostic scores predict outcome in patients with prostate cancer and should be added to their routine clinical assessment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据