4.5 Article

ERG oncoprotein expression in prostate cancer: clonal progression of ERG-positive tumor cells and potential for ERG-based stratification

期刊

PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 228-237

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2010.23

关键词

ERG; oncoprotein; prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia; clonal selection; patient stratification

资金

  1. DoD, CDMRP [PC073614]
  2. Center for Prostate Disease [HU001-04-C-1502]
  3. [RO1 DK065977]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gene fusions prevalent in prostate cancer (CaP) lead to the elevated expression of the ERG protooncogene. ERG activation present in 50-70% of prostate tumors underscores one of the most common oncogenic alterations in CaP. Despite numerous reports of gene fusions and mRNA expression, ERG oncoprotein status in CaP still remains to be defined. Furthermore, development of ERG protein-based assays may provide a new dimension to evaluation of gene fusions involving diverse androgen-regulated promoters and the ERG protein-coding sequence. Through exhaustive evaluations of 132 whole-mount prostates (261 tumor foci and over 200 000 benign glands) for the ERG oncoprotein nuclear expression, we demonstrated 99.9% specificity for detecting prostate tumor cells using a highly specific anti-ERG monoclonal antibody. The ERG oncoprotein expression correlated well with fusion transcript or gene fusion in randomly selected specimens. Strong concordance of ERG-positive foci of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) with ERG-positive carcinoma (82 out of 85 sections with PIN, 96.5%) affirms the biological role of ERG in clonal selection of prostate tumors in 65% (86 out of 132) of patients. Conversely, ERG negative PINs were associated with ERG-negative carcinoma. Taken together, the homogeneous and strong ERG expression detected in individual tumors establishes the potential for ERG oncoprotein-based stratification of CaP. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2010) 13, 228-237; doi:10.1038/pcan.2010.23; published online 29 June 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据