4.8 Article

Effects of Surface Defects on Photocatalytic H2O2 Production by Mesoporous Graphitic Carbon Nitride under Visible Light Irradiation

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 5, 期 5, 页码 3058-3066

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.5b00408

关键词

photocatalysis; hydrogen peroxide; graphitic carbon nitride; visible light; oxygen reduction

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (MEXT) [26289296]
  2. Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology (PRESTO) from Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26289296] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photocatalytic production of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) from ethanol (EtOH) and molecular oxygen (O-2) was carried out by visible light irradiation (lambda > 420 nm) of mesoporous graphitic carbon nitride (GCN) catalysts with different surface areas prepared by silica-templated thermal polymerization of cyanamide. On these catalysts, the photoformed positive hole oxidize EtOH and the conduction band electrons localized at the 1,4-positions of the melem unit promote two-electron reduction of O-2 (H2O2 formation). The GCN catalysts with 56 and 160 m(2) g(-1) surface areas exhibit higher activity for H2O2 production than the catalyst prepared without silica template (surface area: 10 m(2) g(-1)), but a further increase in the surface area (228 m(2) g(-1)) decreases the activity. In addition, the selectivity for H2O2 formation significantly decreases The mesoporous GCN with larger surface areas inherently contain a larger number of primary amine moieties at the surface mesopores. These defects behave as the active sites for four-electron reduction of O-2, thus decreasing the H2O2 selectivity. Furthermore, these defects also behave as the active sites for photocatalytic decomposition of the formed H2O2. Consequently, the GCN catalysts with relatively large surface area but with a small number of surface defects promote relatively efficient H2O2 formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据