4.4 Article

A joint effect of new western diet and retinoid X receptor alpha prostate-specific knockout with development of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in mice-A preliminary study

期刊

PROSTATE
卷 72, 期 10, 页码 1052-1059

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/pros.22496

关键词

prostate cancer; retinoid X receptor a; PIN; New Western Diet; prostate-specific gene knockout

资金

  1. UCLA Clinical Nutrition Research Unit [P30 CA 42710]
  2. NIH [CA T32 CA09142, RO1 CA59705]
  3. NCI [5-R25-CA87949, K07 CA98880]
  4. NCE Division of Cancer Prevention
  5. UCLA Center for Nutritional Research
  6. UCLA Division of Cancer Prevention and Control Research
  7. UCLA School of Public Health
  8. Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND The New Western-style Diet (NWD) characterized by high in fat and low in fiber, vitamin D, calcium, and methyl donorsare considered as a risk factor for prostate cancer. Previous studies have shown that premalignant lesions of human prostate have decreased expression of the Retinoid X Receptor alpha (RXRa). This study was to determine the effect of diet in RXRa knockout mice in developing high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (mPIN). METHODS Male mice (n?=?54) with or without the RXRa prostate null mutation were fed either NWD or AIN-76A control diet for 10 months; prostates were harvested at 11 months of age and examined for prostate mPIN. RESULTS mPIN was seen in 79% of RXRa prostate null mice fed NWD (n?=?19), 30.8% RXRa prostate null mice fed AIN-76A (n?=?13), 42.9% RXRa wild-type mice fed NWD (n?=?14), and 12.5% RXRa wild-type mice fed AIN-76A (n?=?8). Unconditional Logistic analysis showed a significant joint effect of NWD and RXRa status in developing mPIN 26.3 (95% CI: 2.5280), but interaction was not significant owing to the small sample size 1.6 (0.0927.7, P?=?0.7441). CONCLUSION This study provides preliminary data to support a joint RXRa-diet effect in prostate carcinogenesis. Prostate 72:10521059, 2012. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据