4.8 Article

Monitoring the Chemical State of Catalysts for CO2 Electroreduction: An In Operando Study

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 5, 期 12, 页码 7498-7502

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.5b02322

关键词

carbon dioxide electroreduction; tin dioxide; formate; Raman spectroscopy; Faradaic efficiency

资金

  1. EraNet program (ECOON) [156]
  2. University of Bern
  3. CTI Swiss Competence Center for Energy Research (SCCER Heat and Electricity Storage)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A major concern of electrocatalysis research is to assess the structural and chemical changes that a catalyst may itself undergo in the course of the catalyzed process. These changes can influence not only the activity of the studied catalyst but also its selectivity toward the formation of a certain product. An illustrative example is the electroreduction of carbon dioxide on tin oxide nanoparticles, where under the operating conditions of the electrolysis (that is, at cathodic potentials), the catalyst undergoes structural changes which, in an extreme case, involve its reduction to metallic tin. This results in a decreased Faradaic efficiency (FE) for the production of formate (HCOO-) that is otherwise the main product of CO2 reduction on SnOx surfaces. In this study, we utilized potential- and time-dependent in operando Raman spectroscopy in order to monitor the oxidation state changes of SnO2 that accompany CO2 reduction. Investigations were carried out at different alkaline pH levels, and a strong correlation between the oxidation state of the surface and the FE of HCOO- formation was found. At moderately cathodic potentials, SnO2, exhibits a high FE for the production of formate, while at very negative potentials the oxide is reduced to metallic Sn, and the efficiency of formate production is significantly decreased. Interestingly, the highest FE of formate production is measured at potentials where SnO2 is thermodynamically unstable; however, its reduction is kinetically hindered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据