4.8 Article

Characterization of Re-Pd/SiO2 Catalysts for Hydrogenation of Stearic Acid

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 5, 期 11, 页码 7034-7047

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.5b01054

关键词

rhenium; palladium; hydrogenation of carboxylic acid; bimetallic catalyst; reaction mechanism

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [26249121, 263554]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [14J03554, 26249121] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silica-supported Re-Pd bimetallic catalysts (Re-Pd/SiO2) with a high molar ratio of Re/Pd, which were reported to be effective for selective hydrogenation of carboxylic acids to the corresponding fatty alcohols in 1,4-dioxane solvent, were characterized by means of X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and CO adsorption. Various kinds of Re species (hexagonal closed packing (HCP) and face-centered cubic (FCC) Re metals, Re3+, Re4+, and Re6+) were detected on the catalysts after reaction or reduction, and the ratio of these Re species was estimated by the combination of characterization results. The activity of these catalysts is sensitive to air because of the high oxophilicity of Re, and the catalysts must be handled without contact to air. Pd addition and catalyst activation method (liquid-phase reduction and gas-phase reduction) influenced the ratio of the Re species. Liquid-phase reduced Re-Pd/SiO2 (Re/Pd = 8), which is the most effective catalyst, has Pd-0, Re-0, and Ren+ (Re3+ and Re4+) species on the catalyst, and the metal surface (Pd-0, Re-0(HCP), Re-0(FCC)) is modified with Ren+ species. This structure will be responsible for the high hydrogenation activity. Combined with kinetic studies with Re-Pd/SiO2 (Re/Pd = 8) and Re/SiO2 catalysts, Pd plays a role in promoting the reduction and dispersion of Re species, as well as strengthening the interaction of stearic acid with the catalytic surface, and on the other hand, Ren+ plays a role in promoting the heterolytic dissociation of H-2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据