4.4 Article

Individual and Cumulative Effect of Prostate Cancer Risk-Associated Variants on Clinicopathologic Variables in 5,895 Prostate Cancer Patients

期刊

PROSTATE
卷 69, 期 11, 页码 1195-1205

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pros.20970

关键词

association; prostate cancer; genetics; aggressiveness; Gleason score; stage

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [CA129684, CA106523, CA105055, CA95052, CA112517, CA58236]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND. More than a dozen single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been associated with prostate cancer (PCa) risk from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Their association with PCa aggressiveness and clinicopathologic variables is inconclusive. METHODS. Twenty PCa risk SNPs implicated in GWAS and fine mapping studies were evaluated in 5,895 PCa cases treated by radical prostatectomy at Johns Hopkins Hospital, where each tumor was uniformly graded and staged using the same protocol. RESULTS. For 18 of the 20 SNPs examined, no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed in risk allele frequencies between patients with more aggressive (Gleason scores >= 4 + 3, or stage >= T3b, or N+) or less aggressive disease (Gleason scores <= 3 + 4, and stage <= T2, and NO). For the two SNPs that had significant differences between more and less aggressive disease rs2735839 in KLK3 (P = 8.4 x 10(-7)) and rs10993994 in MSMB (P = 0.046), the alleles that are associated with increased risk for PCa were more frequent ill patients with less aggressive disease. Since these SNPs are known to be associated with PSA levels in men without PCa diagnoses, these latter associations may reflect the enrichment of low grade, low stage cases diagnosed by contemporary disease screening with PSA. CONCLUSIONS. The vast majority of PCa risk-associated SNPs are not associated with aggressiveness and clinicopathologic variables of PCa. Correspondingly, they have minimal utility in predicting the risk for developing more or less aggressive forms of PCa. Prostate 69: 1195-1205, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据