4.8 Article

Promiscuous Glucose Oxidase: Electrical Energy Conversion of Multiple Polysaccharides Spanning Starch and Dairy Milk

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 5, 期 12, 页码 7218-7225

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.5b01777

关键词

enzymatic fuel cell; glucose oxidase; lactose oxidation; milk fuel cell; saccharides; enzyme engineering

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1158943]
  2. Marie Curie-Skyokowska Individual Fellowship (Global) under the EUR Commision's Horizon Framework [654836]
  3. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [654836] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1158943] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enzymatic biofiiel cells (EFCs) are devices that are capable of producing electrical energy from the enzymatic oxidation of simple, energy-dense fuels (such as sugars and alcohols). Glucose oxidase (G0x) is perhaps the most widely used enzyme at the bioanode of EFCs, affording devices that can be fueled by glucose. Due to its high substrate specificity, GOx was initially employed in glucose biosensor applications, which later translated into EFC technology. This high substrate specificity, however, often restricts EFC devices to operation on single fuels. Herein, we report the use of a commercial GOx with greater substrate promiscuity (broader substrate G0x, bG0x), which can result in the fabrication of EFCs that can utilize a single versatile catalyst for the oxidation of many mono-, di-, tri-, and polysaccharides. The EFCs presented within this study were fueled by glucose, maltose, maltotriose, cellobiose, lactose, galactose, and xylose. Additionally, the ability for the same biocatalyst to oxidize sugars from alternative sources was investigated, with EFCs producing electrical energy from lactose within dairy milk (0.43 +/- 0.01 mA cm(-2) and 80.1 +/- 1.2 /4W cm(-2)) and starch solutions (0.19 +/- 0.00 rnA cm(-2) and 50.9 +/- 0.9 mu W cm(-2)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据