4.2 Article

A prostacyclin analog prevents the regression of renal microvascular network by inhibiting mitochondria-dependent apoptosis in the kidney of rat progressive glomerulonephritis

期刊

PROSTAGLANDINS & OTHER LIPID MEDIATORS
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 16-26

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2014.06.001

关键词

Prostacyclin analog; Beraprost sodium; Rat anti-glomerular basement membrane glomerulonephritis; Apoptosis; Microvascular network; Chronic kidney diseases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have previously demonstrated that renoprotective effects of a prostacyclin analog, beraprost sodium, on the kidney of anti-glomerular basement membrane glomerulonephritis (GN) rats. The aim of this study is to address the renoprotection mechanism of beraprost sodium, especially in the terminal stage of GN. Beraprost sodium was orally administrated from 2 to 7 weeks after induction of GN, and renal function, morphology, protein and mRNA levels were analyzed. We found the beraprost sodium treatment suppressed the structural regression of renal microvascular network and decline of renal blood flow occurred in the kidney of GN rats. To address the mechanism of the structural maintenance, we focused on apoptosis because the increased number of apoptotic renal microvascular endothelial cells and tubular epithelial cells was observed in the kidneys of GN rats as compared with normal and beraprost sodium treated rats. Protein and mRNA analyses demonstrated that mitochondria-dependent apoptotic pathway was activated in the kidneys of GN rats, and beraprost sodium suppressed the activation by modulating the expression patterns of pro- and anti-apoptotic factors. These results suggest that inhibition of mitochondria-dependent apoptosis of renal cells in GN kidney and consequent maintenance of renal functional structures, including microvascular network might contribute to the renoprotective effect of beraprost sodium in GN. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据