4.8 Article

Toward Understanding Metal-Catalyzed Ethanol Reforming

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 5, 期 6, 页码 3841-3863

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cs5020755

关键词

ethanol reforming; hydrogen production; reaction mechanism; metal catalyst; heterogeneous catalysis; biomass conversion; ethanol decomposition

资金

  1. FAPESP (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo) [2011/50727-9]
  2. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico) [FNI E02/16]
  3. Brazilian Synchrotron Light Laboratory (LNLS)
  4. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [11/50727-9] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Steam reforming of ethanol (SRE) is a strategic reaction for H-2 production. However, despite considerable work, several aspects of the mechanism and catalytic system for this reaction are not fully understood. There have been many efforts to improve the understanding of the catalysts' behavior during SRE, using both theoretical studies and experimental investigations based on operando characterization techniques. Even though cobalt and nickel are considered the most promising catalytically active metals for industrial SRE, acquiring further knowledge on the reaction mechanism, metal support interactions, and catalyst deactivation (due to carbon accumulation, sintering, or metal oxidation) will enable the successful design of new and stable catalysts. In this review, we analyze the reaction pathways for metal-catalyzed SRE and discuss the available experimental and theoretical data to suggest alternatives to address three major issues: (i) the impact of particle size and metal oxidation state in the SRE performance; (ii) the importance of metal surface electronic properties to obtain a balanced and stable catalyst; and (iii) the influence of support on the catalyst selectivity and stability. Clarification of these issues is a key point for understanding the SRE reaction and for the development of new high performance catalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据