3.9 Review

Reaction mechanisms for the heterogeneous hydrogenolysis of biomass-derived glycerol to propanediols

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.3184/97809059274714X13874723178485

关键词

glycerol; hydrogenolysis; 1,2-propanediol; 1,3-propanediol; reaction mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21302237]
  2. Natural Science Foundation Project of CQ CSTC [cstc2011jjA90004]
  3. Opening Project of Key Laboratory of Green Catalysis of Sichuan Institutes of Higher Education [LZJ1104]
  4. Key Project of China Zigong Science & Technology Bureau [2012H07]
  5. Research Foundation of Chongqing University of Science Technology [CK2011B13, CK2013Z06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biomass-derived glycerol is emerging as a renewable, cheap and versatile feedstock for the production of a variety of chemicals and fuels. In particular, hydrogenolysis of glycerol to other value-added chemicals over heterogeneous catalysts has been extensively studied in the past few years. The most desired products arising from this process are propanediols, i.e. 1,2-propanediol and 1,3-propanediol. Both diols are important industrial chemicals, being especially well-known as monomers for the production of many useful polymers. Although hydrogenolysis of glycerol is a promising new route for the production of propanediols, the design of applicable catalysts for its industrialisation is still a great challenge. In order to guide the rational development of efficient catalysts, several possible reaction mechanisms have been proposed based on experimental and theoretical investigations. A brief review is now presented on the reaction mechanisms for the hydrogenolysis of glycerol to propanediols over heterogeneous catalysts. The possible reaction mechanisms are summarised and classified. The main characteristics and general reaction conditions for each reaction mechanism are highlighted. Furthermore, the developing prospects and future direction of research are suggested.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据