4.8 Review

Design and development of fluorescent nanostructures for bioimaging

期刊

PROGRESS IN POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 39, 期 2, 页码 365-395

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.11.001

关键词

Bioimaging; Fluorescence; Nanostructures; Structural design; Sensitivity; Selectivity

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [21174012, 51103008, 51221002]
  2. Ministry of Education, China [NCET-10-0215]
  3. Doctoral Program of Higher Education Research Fund [20100010120006, 20120010110008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Because fluorescence-based techniques are inherently sensitive, selective, convenient, diverse, non-destructive, potentially real time and in situ, they have been widely used in biological imaging. Especially those, with specific fluorescent nanostructures (FNSs) as detecting media in bioimaging, have already been intensively studied for more than a decade because of the convenient transduction of optical signal, high sensitivity and rapid response of FNSs. In this review, we summarize the major strategies to design FNSs with specific structures for biological imaging. First, recent advances are briefly introduced. Then, the specific design of FNSs and their applications are reviewed, in which their fluorescence mechanism, strategies in designing and development, preparation methods, and some representative applications in bioimaging are described. Finally, future perspectives and ongoing issues of FNSs and their applications in bioimaging are discussed. Although many FNSs have been synthesized and applied biologically, many studies still should be done before they can be widely employed as fluorescent probes in clinical tests. With further advances in design and synthesis of high quality multifunctional FNSs, the widespread application of FNSs may be expected not only in advanced bioimaging, but also in ultra-sensitive molecular diagnosis, novel light-emitting nanodevices and intracellular drug delivery. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据