4.8 Review

Polymer-inorganic supramolecular nanohybrids for red, white, green, and blue applications

期刊

PROGRESS IN POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 38, 期 10-11, 页码 1442-1486

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.007

关键词

Nanohybrid; Layered materials; Polymer; Supramolecule

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea
  2. Korean Government (SRC Program) [2012-0000650]
  3. Korean Government (WCU) [R31-2008-000-10010-0]
  4. Ministry of Knowledge Economy [10041239]
  5. BioGreen 21 Program [20070501034007]
  6. Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea
  7. Ewha Womans University
  8. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10041239] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  9. Rural Development Administration (RDA), Republic of Korea [20070501034007] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Layered nanohybrids are heterostructured materials composed of two-dimensional inorganic host and intercalating inorganic-, organic-, bio-, or polymer guests. Such materials have been extensively explored to create new multifunctional hybrid systems that integrate nanotechnology (NT), biotechnology (BT), information technology (IT), and even congnitive technology (CT). In this review, an attempt is made to classify and highlight recent advances in multifunctional nanohybrids based on layered materials and their related application systems; (i) red nanohybrid on life science and health-care sectors, (ii) white nanohybrid on energy and environmental ones, (iii) green nanohybrid on agriculture and food ones, and (iv) blue hybrid on aqua and marine ones. In details, the structural features and functions of the layered nanomaterials and their hybrid systems are discussed in each section. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据