4.8 Review

Rheology to understand and optimize processibility, structures and properties of starch polymeric materials

期刊

PROGRESS IN POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 37, 期 4, 页码 595-623

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.07.002

关键词

Starch; Melt; Processing; Rheology; Shear; Extension

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reviews the state of the art in the field of the rheology of starch polymers, including specially designed rheometric techniques and complex rheology as influenced by different conditions. In terms of rheometric techniques, off-line extruder-type capillary/slit rheometers are commonly used but subsequent changes during measurement often occur as starch structures are highly sensitive to thermomechanical treatment. An in-line rheometer set-up with a double-channel die incorporated to the processing extruder is a direct and effective method to minimize the processing history change at different testing shear rates. In addition, pre-shearing, multipass, and mixer-type rheometers are also suitable for starch polymers. The rheological behavior of starch polymeric materials can be greatly impacted by their formulation (botanical source, plasticizer and additive type and content, and the structure related to blend or composite) and processing conditions (temperature, mechanical energy, etc.). Starch polymer melts exhibit shear-thinning and extension-thinning behaviors, and shows strong elastic properties. A wide range of rheological models, considering formulation and processing conditions, have been reviewed for different multiphase systems. The rheological behavior can also be related to the compatibility (blends, composites), expansion/foaming properties, film blowing properties, etc. The significance of processing rheology of starch polymers lies in characterizing the complex melting and flow behaviors, characterizing the viscoelastic properties, determining optimal processing method and conditions, and better controlling the quality of the final products. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据