4.8 Review

Activation in anionic polymerization: Why phosphazene bases are very exciting promoters

期刊

PROGRESS IN POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 36, 期 9, 页码 1132-1151

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.05.005

关键词

Anionic polymerization; Phosphazene bases; Phosphazenium counterions; Cryptates; Metal-free initiators; Ring-opening polymerization (ROP); (Meth)acrylates; Epoxides; Cyclosiloxanes; Cyclic esters; Lactams; Cyclopropane-1,1-dicarboxylates

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, nitrogen-phosphorous hybrid organobases such as phosphazene bases (PBs), which possess a remarkably high basicity, have been extensively studied in organic synthesis. Their applications in the domain of anionic polymerization are reviewed. Those non-ionic superbases generate highly reactive anionic species according to two different pathways: firstly by deprotonation of weak acids in which the protonated phosphazene base forms the cation, and secondly by complexation of the lithium cation by the phosphazene base when organolithium compounds are used as initiators. They have been successfully used for the anionic ring-opening polymerization (AROP) of epoxides, cyclosiloxanes, cyclic esters, caprolactam, and very recently cyclopropane-1,1-dicarboxylates, as well as for the anionic polymerization of vinyl monomers such as methacrylates, acrylates, butadiene, and isoprene. Polymerizations with metal-free non-protonated phosphazenium counterions are also reviewed. In all cases, the rates of polymerization are much higher than those observed with metal cations, and similar to the values obtained with cryptated counterions. The use of protonated and non-protonated phosphazenium counterions leads generally to polymers with narrow molecular weight distributions, and well-controlled end groups. Advantages of PBs are discussed, and perspectives in the revisited domain of anionic activation applied to polymer chemistry are presented. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据