4.7 Article

Origin of the Low Carrier Lifetime Edge Zone in Multicrystalline PV Silicon

期刊

PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS
卷 17, 期 5, 页码 289-296

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pip.876

关键词

multicrystalline silicon; edge zone; minority charge carrier lifetime; interstitial iron; impurities; defects

资金

  1. Norwegian Research Council
  2. Renewable Energy Cooperation
  3. Elkem Solar

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An investigation of impurities, crystal defects and microstructure has been performed on the edge zone, i.e. close to the crucible wall, which experiences reduced carrier lifetime in a directionally solidified multicrystalline p-doped silicon ingot. The characterization methods applied have been QSSPC, FTIR, mu W-PCD, EBSD, CDI, PVScan, optical microscopy, FeB-pair splitting and GDMS. The results of the minority carrier lifetime measurements have revealed strong v reduced values in the vicinity of the edge (< 1 mu s). Increased values were obtained starting at 1.5-17 mm from the edge. Light elements analyses showed that the O, N and C concentrations, interstitially, or in particles, did not increase in the edge zone, neither did the dislocation density. GDMS analyses detected traces of aluminium, iron, copper, titanium and chromium. The total iron concentration showed an increase towards the edge, though high concentrations were occasionally detected in the bulk Fell pair analysis revealed large concentrations of Fe (similar to 1 X 10(13) cm(-3)) in the vicinity of the edge with a distinctively decreasing trend moving away front the edge. The detected Fell-concentrations are sufficient to account for the majority of the 1 lifetime degradation close to the edge (0-15 mm). In addition, Fe, in the form of Fell pairs, was extensively observed as object to internal gettering to high angle boundaries and dislocations. Fe, in the form of FeB pairs, is furthermore believed to originale from solid state diffusion from the crucible and coating. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据