4.7 Article

Photovoltaic module reliability model based on field degradation studies

期刊

PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 419-433

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pip.825

关键词

photovoltaic module; reliability; degradation; MTTF; warranty

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry for Education and Science [TEC2005-02745]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crystalline silicon photovoltaic (PV) modules are often stated as being the most reliable element in PV systems. This presumable high reliability is reflected by their long power warranty periods. lit agreement with these long warranty times, PV modules have a very low total number of returns, the exceptions usually being the result of catastrophic failures. Up to now, failures resulting from degradation are not typically taken into consideration because of the difficulties in measuring the power of an individual module in a system. However, lasting recent years PV systems are changing from small isolated systems to large grid-connected power stations. lit this new scenario, customers will become more sensitive to power losses and the need for a reliability model based on degradation may become of utmost importance. lit this paper, a PV module reliability model based on degradation studies is presented. The main analytical functions of reliability engineering are evaluated using this model and applied to a practical case, based on state-of-the-art parameters of crystalline silicon PV technology. Relevant and defensible power warranties and other reliability data are obtained with this model based on measured degradation rates and time-dependent power variability. lit the derivation of the model some assumptions are made about the future behaviour of the products-i.e. linear degradation rates-although the approach can be used for other assumed functional profiles as well. The method documented in this paper explicitly shows manufacturers how to make reasonable and sensible warranty projections. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据