4.8 Article

Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8414

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche Programme OGM [ANR-06-POGM-004]
  2. EC FP6 ALARM-Project [GOCE-CT-2003-506675]
  3. LEGATO-Project (German Federal Ministry of Education and Research) [DLR 01LL0917D]
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  5. Defra
  6. Natural Environment Research Council
  7. Scottish Government
  8. Welcome Trust under the Insect Pollinators Initiative
  9. Army Research Organization
  10. Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt
  11. German Research Foundation [DFG BA 4438/1-1]
  12. EC FP5 project EASY [QLRT 2001 01495]
  13. EC FP7 project STEP [244090]
  14. EC FP7 project LIBERATION [311781]
  15. EC FP7 project SCALES
  16. Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs [BO-11-011.01-011]
  17. French Ministry of Agriculture (CASDAR programme) [9035]
  18. ANRT CIFRE PhD grant GEF/UNEP/FAO Global Pollination Project
  19. MBIE Bee Minus to Bee Plus [C11X1309]
  20. Foundation for Arable Research
  21. MTA Lendulet programme
  22. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund [OTKA NN 101940]
  23. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC-CANPOLIN)
  24. BC Blueberry Council
  25. NSF GRFP
  26. NIFA (National Institute for Food and Agriculture, USDA)
  27. Western SARE (Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education)
  28. NSF-DBI [0956388]
  29. Robert G. Goelet Fund [USDA 2010-03689]
  30. Smith Lever Fund [USDA 2010-03689]
  31. Hatch Fund [USDA 2010-03689]
  32. Swedish Research Council Formas
  33. Israel Ministry of Agriculture [824-0112-08]
  34. Israel Science Foundation [919/09]
  35. Ministry for Science and Culture of Lower Saxony [11-76-251-99-06/08]
  36. USDA [NIFA-AFRI 2009-65104-05782]
  37. New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station [08204]
  38. USDA AFRI [2009-02305]
  39. USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service [69-3A75-10-163]
  40. Virginia Cooperative Extension
  41. Virginia Tech Graduate Student Assembly
  42. New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE) [C11X1309] Funding Source: New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE)
  43. Direct For Biological Sciences [0956340] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  44. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [0956340] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  45. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I000348/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  46. BBSRC [BB/I000348/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is compelling evidence that more diverse ecosystems deliver greater benefits to people, and these ecosystem services have become a key argument for biodiversity conservation. However, it is unclear how much biodiversity is needed to deliver ecosystem services in a cost- effective way. Here we show that, while the contribution of wild bees to crop production is significant, service delivery is restricted to a limited subset of all known bee species. Across crops, years and biogeographical regions, crop-visiting wild bee communities are dominated by a small number of common species, and threatened species are rarely observed on crops. Dominant crop pollinators persist under agricultural expansion and many are easily enhanced by simple conservation measures, suggesting that cost- effective management strategies to promote crop pollination should target a different set of species than management strategies to promote threatened bees. Conserving the biological diversity of bees therefore requires more than just ecosystem-service-based arguments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据