4.8 Article

Deviation from high-entropy configurations in the atomic distributions of a multi-principal-element alloy

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6964

关键词

-

资金

  1. Office of Basic Energy Sciences, US Department of Energy [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  2. UT-Battelle
  3. LLC
  4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  5. DOE [DE-SC0004684]
  6. Innovative Processing and Technologies Program of the National Energy Technology Laboratory's (NETL) Strategic Center for Coal under the Research and Engineering Services (RES) [DE-FE-0004000]
  7. Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE) [DMR120048]
  8. National Science Foundation [DMR-0909037, CMMI-0900291, CMMI-1100080]
  9. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy's Nuclear Energy University Programs (NEUP) [00119262]
  10. DOE Office of Fossil Energy, NETL [DE-FE0008855, DE-FE-0011194]
  11. NSF
  12. University of Tennessee
  13. U.S. Army Office Project [W911NF-13-1-0438]
  14. United States Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The alloy-design strategy of combining multiple elements in near-equimolar ratios has shown great potential for producing exceptional engineering materials, often known as 'high-entropy alloys'. Understanding the elemental distribution, and, thus, the evolution of the configurational entropy during solidification, is undertaken in the present study using the Al1.3CoCr-CuFeNi model alloy. Here we show that, even when the material undergoes elemental segregation, precipitation, chemical ordering and spinodal decomposition, a significant amount of disorder remains, due to the distributions of multiple elements in the major phases. The results suggest that the high-entropy alloy-design strategy may be applied to a wide range of complex materials, and should not be limited to the goal of creating single-phase solid solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据