4.7 Review

Blood and plasma-based proteomic biomarker research in Alzheimer's disease

期刊

PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 101, 期 -, 页码 1-17

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.06.007

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Biomarkers; Proteomics; Mass spectrometry; Plasma; Serum

资金

  1. LOEWE excellence initiative Neuronal Coordination Research Focus Frankfurt (NeFF), neurodegeneration branch, Alzheimer's disease project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most important cause of dementia in the elderly. The molecular alterations preceding this neurodegenerative pathology may take place even 20 years before its clinical appearance. In this context, the discovery of biomarkers in biological fluids enabling an early presymptomatic diagnosis as well as discrimination from other types of dementia is eagerly awaited. In particular, since the traditional markers obtained both from cerebrospinal fluid inspection and neuroimaging approaches have not achieved a broad clinical application, research efforts have been focused on the development and validation of biomarkers in blood. The benefit of searching for blood-based candidate biomarkers is evident due to the easiness and non-invasiveness nature of blood samples collection compared with any other body fluid. As a result, blood may constitute a rich source of disease biomarkers. Interestingly, among the technological platforms used to perform research into the biomarker discovery arena, proteomics has attained more recent consideration. In the present review, we provide a comprehensive assessment of patterns of biomarkers detected in plasma and serum specimens for the diagnosis of AD by employing proteomic approaches. Currently, growing evidence suggests that blood protein signatures are helpful to increase the likelihood of successful diagnosis of AD. Accordingly, this area of research promises to yield exciting results in the next future. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据