4.7 Review

The cognitive functions of the caudate nucleus

期刊

PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 86, 期 3, 页码 141-155

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2008.09.004

关键词

Caudate nucleus; Putamen; Cognition; Basal ganglia; Coal-directed action; Striatum; fMRI; PET; Parkinson's disease; Huntington's disease; Animal behaviour

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_U105559837, MC_U105559847] Funding Source: Medline
  2. MRC [MC_U105559837, MC_U105559847] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U105559847, MC_U105559837] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The basal ganglia as a whole are broadly responsible for sensorimotor coordination, including response selection and initiation. However, it has become increasingly clear that regions of the basal ganglia are functionally delineated along corticostriatal lines, and that a modular conception of the respective functions of various nuclei is useful. Here we examine the specific role of the caudate nucleus, and in particular, how this differs from that of the putamen. This review considers converging evidence from multiple domains including anatomical studies of corticostriatal circuitry, neuroimaging studies of healthy volunteers, patient studies of performance deficits on a variety of cognitive tests, and animal studies of behavioural control. We conclude that the caudate nucleus contributes to behaviour through the excitation of correct action schemas and the selection of appropriate sub-goals based on an evaluation of action-outcomes; both processes fundamental to successful goal-directed action. This is in contrast to the putamen, which appears to subserve cognitive functions more limited to stimulusresponse, or habit, learning. This modular conception of the striatum is consistent with hierarchical models of cortico-striatal function through which adaptive behaviour towards significant goals can be identified (motivation; ventral striatum), planned (cognition: caudate) and implemented (sensorimotor coordination; putamen) effectively. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据