4.7 Review

Wnt signaling in neuroprotection and stem cell differentiation

期刊

PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 86, 期 3, 页码 281-296

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2008.08.001

关键词

Wnt signaling; Stem cells; Neuroprotection; Alzheimer's disease; Crosstalking

资金

  1. Millenium Institute for Fundamental and Applied Biology (MIFAB) [FONDAP 13980001]
  2. CARE Center
  3. Conicyt
  4. DIPUC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the past several years, we postulated that the loss of Wnt signaling was implicated in the pathology of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Since then, our lab and other groups have confirmed the involvement of the Wnt signaling in some aspects of AD. So far, we have demonstrated that activation of Wnt signaling protects neurons against neurotoxic injuries, including both amyloid-beta (A beta) fibrils and A beta oligomers by using either lithium, an inhibitor of the glycogen-synthase-kinase-3 beta (GSK-3 beta), or different Wnt ligands. Also, we have found that several molecules which activate well known neurotransmitter systems and other signaling system, are able by crosstalk to activate Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in order to protect neurons against both A beta fibrils or A beta oligomers. In particular, the activation of non-canonical Wnt signaling was able to protect postsynaptic regions and dendritic spines against A beta oligomers. Furthermore Wnt signaling ligands also affect stem cells, and they are also involved in cell fate decision during neurogenesis and embryonic development as well as in adult stem cells differentiation in the nervous system. The Wnt signaling plays a key role modulating their cell differentiation or proliferation states. Altogether, these findings in both stem cell biology and neuroprotection, may introduce new approaches in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, including drug screening and therapies against neurodegenerative diseases which activates the Wnt signaling pathway. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据