4.6 Review

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene and protein expression in pediatric and adult depressed subjects

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.03.003

关键词

BDNF; Depression; Lymphocytes; mRNA; Pediatric depression; Platelets

资金

  1. National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, MD [RO1-MH-56528]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a member of a neurotrophin family and is involved in many physiological functions, including cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation, and neuron survival in the human nervous system. Abnormalities of BDNF have been implicated in the pathophysiology of depression based on observations that antidepressant drugs cause increases in the levels of BDNF in rat brains and its abnormalities have appeared in the serum of depressed patients and in postmortem brains of suicide victims. Methods: We examined the gene expression of BDNF in the lymphocytes and protein expression in the platelets of adult and pediatric depressed patients during a drug-free period. We determined BDNF gene expression using a quantitative RT-PCR method and protein expression using the ELISA method. Results: We observed that the gene expression of BDNF was significantly decreased in the lymphocytes of adult and pediatric depressed patients compared with normal control subjects. Similarly, the protein expression of BDNF was significantly decreased in the platelets of adult and pediatric depressed patients compared with normal control subjects. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study that reports a decrease in BDNF gene expression in the peripheral cells of depressed patients. Because of the bidirectional movement of BDNF between the periphery and the CNS, the reduced gene expression in the lymphocytes and the protein expression in the platelets may be an index of similar abnormalities in the brain and could be a target for antidepressant drugs. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据