4.6 Review

Serum levels of platelet-derived growth factor BB homodimers are increased in male children with autism

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2009.10.017

关键词

Autism; ELISA; Human serum; Platelet-derived growth factor; Vascular endothelial growth factor

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Japan
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21200014] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The neurobiological basis of autism remains poorly understood. To examine the role played by serum cytokines in brain development, we hypothesized that Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (PDGF) and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) may be associated with pathophysiology of autism. In this study, we screened serum levels of these growth factors in young male subjects with autism. Methods: We measured serum levels of PDGF subtypes and VEGF in the 31 male children with autism (6-19 years old) and 31 healthy age-and gender-matched subjects. Results: The serum levels of PDGF-BB in male children with autism (N = 31,5624.5 +/- 1651.8 pg/mL [mean +/- SD]) were significantly higher (two-tailed Student's t-test: p = 0.0188) than those of normal control subjects (N = 31, 4758.2 +/- 1521.5 pg/mL [mean +/- SD]). There was a significant and positive correlation (Pearson's r = 0.5320, p = 0.0010) between the serum levels of PDGF-BB and the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) domain C scores, which represent stereotyped patterns of behavior in the children with autism. However, there were no marked or significant correlations between serum PDGF-BB levels and clinical variables, including the other ADI-R scores and Intellectual Quotient (IQ) scores by WAIS-R. There were no significant change and correlations with clinical variables in serum PDGF-AA, PDGF-AB, and VEGF levels in the children with autism. Conclusions: Increased levels of serum PDGF-BB homodimers might be implicated in the pathophysiology of autism. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据