4.8 Article

Global priorities for an effective information basis of biodiversity distributions

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9221

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt (DBU)
  2. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
  3. Universitatsbund Gottingen
  4. German Research Council (DFG)
  5. NSF [DBI 0960550, DEB 1026764, DBI-1262600]
  6. NASA [NNX11AP72G]
  7. Yale Program in Spatial Biodiversity Science and Conservation
  8. Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Gottingen
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences
  10. Division Of Environmental Biology [1026764] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Direct For Biological Sciences
  12. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1535793] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  13. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  14. Direct For Biological Sciences [1262600] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gaps in digital accessible information (DAI) on species distributions hamper prospects of safeguarding biodiversity and ecosystem services, and addressing central ecological and evolutionary questions. Achieving international targets on biodiversity knowledge requires that information gaps be identified and actions prioritized. Integrating 157 million point records and distribution maps for 21,170 terrestrial vertebrate species, we find that outside a few well-sampled regions, DAI on point occurrences provides very limited and spatially biased inventories of species. Surprisingly, many large, emerging economies are even more under-represented in global DAI than species-rich, developing countries in the tropics. Multi-model inference reveals that completeness is mainly limited by distance to researchers, locally available research funding and participation in data-sharing networks, rather than transportation infrastructure, or size and funding of Western data contributors as often assumed. Our results highlight the urgent need for integrating non-Western data sources and intensifying cooperation to more effectively address societal biodiversity information needs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据