4.6 Review

New roles for acyl-CoA-binding proteins (ACBPs) in plant development, stress responses and lipid metabolism

期刊

PROGRESS IN LIPID RESEARCH
卷 50, 期 2, 页码 141-151

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.plipres.2010.11.002

关键词

Acyl-CoA-binding domain; Embryogenesis; Freezing tolerance; Heavy metal resistance; Leaf senescence; Oxidative stress; Phospholipid metabolism

资金

  1. University of Hong Kong [10208034]
  2. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [HKU7047/07M]
  3. University Grants Committee of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [AoE/B-07/99]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ACBPs are implicated in acyl-CoA trafficking in many eukaryotes and some prokaryotes. Six genes encode proteins designated as AtACBP1-AtACBP6 in the Arabidopsis thaliana ACBP family. These ACBPs are conserved in the acyl-CoA-binding domain, but vary in size from 92 amino acids (10.4 kDa) to 668 amino acids (73.1 kDa), and are subcellularly localised to different compartments in plant cells. Results from in vitro binding assays show that their corresponding recombinant proteins exhibit differential binding affinities to acyl-CoA esters and phospholipids, implying that these ACBPs may have non-redundant biological functions in vivo. By using knockout/downregulated and overexpression lines of Arabidopsis ACBPs, recent investigations have revealed that in addition to their proposed roles in phospholipid metabolism, these ACBPs can influence plant development including early embryogenesis and leaf senescence, as well as plant stress responses including heavy metal resistance, oxidative stress, freezing tolerance and pathogen resistance. In this review, recent progress on the biochemical and functional analyses of Arabidopsis ACBPs, their links to metabolic/signalling pathways, and their potential applications in development of stress tolerance are discussed. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据