4.3 Review

A unified model of CA1/3 pyramidal cells: An investigation into excitability

期刊

PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 105, 期 1-2, 页码 34-48

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2010.09.020

关键词

Excitability; Pyramidal cell model; Transient dynamics; After-depolarisation (ADP); Bursting-threshold; Sensitivity analysis

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/E032249/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/E032249/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E032249/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

After-depolarisation is a hallmark of excitability in hippocampal pyramidal cells of CA1 and CA3 regions, because it constitutes the subthreshold relation between inward and outward ionic currents. This relationship determines the nominal response to stimuli and provides the necessary conditions for firing a spike or a burst of action potentials. Nevertheless, after-depolarisation is an inherently transient phenomenon that is not very well understood. We study after-depolarisation using a single-compartment pyramidal-cell model based on recent voltage-and current-clamp experimental data. We systematically investigate CA1 and CA3 behaviour and show that changes to maximal conductances of T-type Ca2+-current and muscarinic-sensitive and delayed rectifier K+-currents are sufficient to switch the behaviour of the model from a CA3 to a CA1 neuron. We use model analysis to define after-depolarisation and bursting threshold. We also explain the influence of particular ionic currents on this phenomenon. This study ends with a sensitivity analysis that demonstrates the influence of specific currents on excitability. Counter-intuitively, we find that a decrease of Na+ -current could cause an increase in excitability. Our analysis suggests that a change of high-voltage activated Ca2+-current can have a similar effect. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据