4.3 Article

Sinus node dysfunction in ATX-II-induced in-vitro murine model of long QT3 syndrome and rescue effect of ranolazine

期刊

PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 98, 期 2-3, 页码 198-207

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2009.01.003

关键词

ATX-II; SCN5A; Sinus node dysfunction; Late Na current; I-Na,I-L; LQT3

资金

  1. Chinese Nature Science Foundation [30470634]
  2. Chinese Scholar Research Council
  3. Wellcome Trust
  4. British Heart Foundation
  5. CVT Research Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to characterize the role of the late Na+ Current (I-Na,I-L) as a mechanism for induction of both tachy and bradyarrhythmias in murine heart and sino-atrial node tissue. The sea anemone toxin ATX-II and ranolazine were used to increase and inhibit, respectively, IN I-Na,I-L In sixteen hearts studied. exposure to 1-10 nM ATX-II Caused a slowing of intrinsic heart Late and prolongations of the P-R and QT intervals, the duration of the monophasic action potential, and the sinus node recovery time, accompanied by frequent Occurrences of early afterdepolarisations, delayed afterdepolarisations and rapid, repetitive ventricular tachy and sino-atrial bradyarrhythmias. ATX-II also slowed sinus node pacemaking, and induced bradycardic arrhythmias in isolated sino-atrial preparations (n = 5). The ATX-II-incluced alteration of electrophysiological properties and Occurrence of arrhythmic events were significantly attenuated by 10 IN ranolazine in intact hearts (n = 11) and isolated sino-atrial preparations (n = 5). In conclusion, the I-Na,I-L enhancer ATX-II causes both tachy and bradyarrhythmias in the murine heart, and these arrhythmias are markedly attenuated by the I-Na,I-L blocker, ranolazine (10 mu M). The results suggest that I-Na,I-L blockade may be the mechanism underlying the reductions of both brady and tachy-arrhythmias by ranolazine that were observed during the MERLIN-TIMI Clinical outcomes trial. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据