4.7 Article

COD removal from biologically stabilized landfill leachate using Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs)

期刊

PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
卷 120, 期 -, 页码 278-285

出版社

INST CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2018.09.014

关键词

Landfill leachate treatment; COD removal; Advanced Oxidation Processes; Aerobic SBR; Ozonation; Fenton's reagents

资金

  1. CREAT H2O program by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The removal of soluble organic matter from mature landfill leachate by means of biological, chemical, and combined biological-chemical methods was investigated in this study. Aerobic sequencing batch reactor (SBR) with activated sludge was used as the biological treatment to remove ammonium. The chemical treatments included ozone (O-3), ozone + hydrogen peroxide (O-3 + H2O2), Fenton's reagents (H2O2 + Fe2+), and ozone + Fenton's reagents (O-3 + H2O2 + Fe2+). Results indicated that the SBR achieved approximately 25% Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) removal with an initial COD of 1276 mg/L. Ozonation of raw leachate achieved 16% COD removal after 240 min of treatment while O-3 + H2O2 achieved 33% COD removal of raw leachate with 900 mg/L H2O2 in 120 min. Moreover, Fenton's process also achieved 33% COD removal from raw leachate. Results suggest that the biological treatment followed by chemical treatments had the most efficient COD removal. After biological stabilization, ozonation removed 52% of the COD within 240 min. The Fenton's process achieved 67% COD removal using equal doses of H2O2 and Fe2+. However, Fenton's reagents in conjunction with O-3 removed 69% and 72% COD in 120 min and 240 min, respectively. The dosage test also revealed that the 2:1 ratio of H2O2 and Fez' had the best COD removal. Therefore, these results indicate that the combination of biological and post-chemical treatment methods effectively remove organic pollutants from mature landfill leachate. (C) 2018 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据