4.8 Article

Mode-selective vibrational modulation of charge transport in organic electronic devices

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8880

关键词

-

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  2. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [639750]
  3. EU [29866]
  4. Council for Higher Education (Israel)
  5. MURI Center on Advanced Molecular Photovoltaics [N00014-14-1-0580]
  6. Office of Naval Research
  7. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)
  8. ONR Global [N62909-15-1-2003]
  9. Israel Science Foundation Centre of Excellence program
  10. Grand Centre for Sensors and Security
  11. Schmidt Minerva Centre for Supramolecular Architecture
  12. European Research Council (ERC) [639750] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The soft character of organic materials leads to strong coupling between molecular, nuclear and electronic dynamics. This coupling opens the way to influence charge transport in organic electronic devices by exciting molecular vibrational motions. However, despite encouraging theoretical predictions, experimental realization of such approach has remained elusive. Here we demonstrate experimentally that photoconductivity in a model organic optoelectronic device can be modulated by the selective excitation of molecular vibrations. Using an ultrafast infrared laser source to create a coherent superposition of vibrational motions in a pentacene/C-60 photoresistor, we observe that excitation of certain modes in the 1,500-1,700 cm(-1) region leads to photocurrent enhancement. Excited vibrations affect predominantly trapped carriers. The effect depends on the nature of the vibration and its mode-specific character can be well described by the vibrational modulation of intermolecular electronic couplings. This presents a new tool for studying electron-phonon coupling and charge dynamics in (bio) molecular materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据