4.8 Article

Local destruction of superconductivity by non-magnetic impurities in mesoscopic iron-based superconductors

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8614

关键词

-

资金

  1. Flemish government
  2. Flemish Science Foundation (FWO)
  3. COST Action MP1201 from EU
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11234006, 51102188]
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  6. World Premier International Research Center from MEXT
  7. JSPS [25289233, 25289108]
  8. Funding Program for World-Leading Innovative R&D on Science and Technology (FIRST Program) from JSPS
  9. European Research Council, ERC Grant [246791-COUNTATOMS]
  10. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25289108] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The determination of the pairing symmetry is one of the most crucial issues for the iron-based superconductors, for which various scenarios are discussed controversially. Non-magnetic impurity substitution is one of the most promising approaches to address the issue, because the pair-breaking mechanism from the non-magnetic impurities should be different for various models. Previous substitution experiments demonstrated that the non-magnetic zinc can suppress the superconductivity of various iron-based superconductors. Here we demonstrate the local destruction of superconductivity by non-magnetic zinc impurities in Ba0.5K0.5Fe2As2 by exploring phase-slip phenomena in a mesoscopic structure with 119 x 102 nm(2) cross-section. The impurities suppress superconductivity in a three-dimensional 'Swiss cheese'-like pattern with in-plane and out-of-plane characteristic lengths slightly below similar to 1.34 nm. This causes the superconducting order parameter to vary along abundant narrow channels with effective cross-section of a few square nanometres. The local destruction of superconductivity can be related to Cooper pair breaking by non-magnetic impurities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据