4.8 Article

The surface structure of silver-coated gold nanocrystals and its influence on shape control

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8664

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSERC Canada
  2. National Science Foundation's MRSEC program at the Materials Research Center of Northwestern University [DMR-1121262]
  3. NSF
  4. Department of Defense through the National Defense Science & Engineering Graduate Fellowship Program [32 CFR 168a]
  5. University of California, Riverside
  6. Office of Science of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  7. NSERC
  8. CIHR
  9. University of Saskatchewan
  10. US Department of Energy-Basic Energy Sciences
  11. CLS
  12. University of Washington
  13. Advanced Photon Source
  14. US DOE [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the surface structure of metal nanocrystals with specific facet indices is important due to its impact on controlling nanocrystal shape and functionality. However, this is particularly challenging for halide-adsorbed nanocrystals due to the difficulty in analysing interactions between metals and light halides (for example, chloride). Here we uncover the surface structures of chloride-adsorbed, silver-coated gold nanocrystals with {111}, {110}, {310} and {720} indexed facets by X-ray absorption spectroscopy and density functional theory modelling. The silver-chloride, silver-silver and silver-gold bonding structures are markedly different between the nanocrystal surfaces, and are sensitive to their formation mechanism and facet type. A unique approach of combining the density functional theory and experimental/simulated X-ray spectroscopy further verifies the surface structure models and identifies the previously indistinguishable valence state of silver atoms on the nanocrystal surfaces. Overall, this work elucidates the thus-far unknown chloride-metal nanocrystal surface structures and sheds light onto the halide-induced growth mechanism of anisotropic nanocrystals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据