4.7 Article

Immediate replacement of fishing with dairying by the earliest farmers of the northeast Atlantic archipelagos

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2372

关键词

Neolithic diet; archaeology; pottery; biomarkers; lipids; stable carbon isotopes

资金

  1. UK Natural Environment Research Council [NE/F021054/1]
  2. EU FP7 (Marie Curie Actions) under REA grant [273462]
  3. NERC [NE/F021054/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/F021054/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The appearance of farming, from its inception in the Near East around 12 000 years ago, finally reached the northwestern extremes of Europe by the fourth millennium BC or shortly thereafter. Various models have been invoked to explain the Neolithization of northern Europe; however, resolving these different scenarios has proved problematic due to poor faunal preservation and the lack of specificity achievable for commonly applied proxies. Here, we present new multi-proxy evidence, which qualitatively and quantitatively maps subsistence change in the northeast Atlantic archipelagos from the Late Mesolithic into the Neolithic and beyond. A model involving significant retention of hunter-gatherer-fisher influences was tested against one of the dominant adoptions of farming using a novel suite of lipid biomarkers, including dihydroxy fatty acids, omega-(o-alkylphenyl)alkanoic acids and stable carbon isotope signatures of individual fatty acids preserved in cooking vessels. These new findings, together with archaeozoological and human skeletal collagen bulk stable carbon isotope proxies, unequivocally confirm rejection of marine resources by early farmers coinciding with the adoption of intensive dairy farming. This pattern of Neolithization contrasts markedly to that occurring contemporaneously in the Baltic, suggesting that geographically distinct ecological and cultural influences dictated the evolution of subsistence practices at this critical phase of European prehistory.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据