4.7 Article

Global distribution and drivers of language extinction risk

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1574

关键词

cultural conservation; cultural diversity; endangered languages; human ecology; language conservation; macroecology

资金

  1. European Commission [PIIF-GA-2011-303221]
  2. Chair Modelisation Mathematique et Biodiversite (VEOLIAsimilar toEcole Polytechniquesimilar toMNHNsimilar toF-X)
  3. Carlsberg Foundation
  4. Arcadia Fund
  5. Danish National Research Foundation
  6. European Research Council [ERC-2012-StG-310886-HISTFUNC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many of the world's languages face serious risk of extinction. Efforts to prevent this cultural loss are severely constrained by a poor understanding of the geographical patterns and drivers of extinction risk. We quantify the global distribution of language extinction risk-represented by small range and speaker population sizes and rapid declines in the number of speakers-and identify the underlying environmental and socioeconomic drivers. We show that both small range and speaker population sizes are associated with rapid declines in speaker numbers, causing 25% of existing languages to be threatened based on criteria used for species. Language range and population sizes are small in tropical and arctic regions, particularly in areas with high rainfall, high topographic heterogeneity and/or rapidly growing human populations. By contrast, recent speaker declines have mainly occurred at high latitudes and are strongly linked to high economic growth. Threatened languages are numerous in the tropics, the Himalayas and northwestern North America. These results indicate that small-population languages remaining in economically developed regions are seriously threatened by continued speaker declines. However, risks of future language losses are especially high in the tropics and in the Himalayas, as these regions harbour many small-population languages and are undergoing rapid economic growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据