4.7 Review

Running with the Red Queen: the role of biotic conflicts in evolution

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1382

关键词

Red Queen hypothesis; coevolution; sexual selection

资金

  1. Royal Society
  2. Natural Environment Research Council
  3. European Research Council
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L003139/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/K011774/1, NE/K004697/1, NE/I01067X/1, NE/J024244/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. BBSRC [BB/L003139/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. NERC [NE/K011774/1, NE/I01067X/1, NE/K004697/1, NE/J024244/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

What are the causes of natural selection? Over 40 years ago, Van Valen proposed the Red Queen hypothesis, which emphasized the primacy of biotic conflict over abiotic forces in driving selection. Species must continually evolve to survive in the face of their evolving enemies, yet on average their fitness remains unchanged. We define three modes of Red Queen coevolution to unify both fluctuating and directional selection within the Red Queen framework. Empirical evidence from natural interspecific antagonisms provides support for each of these modes of coevolution and suggests that they often operate simultaneously. We argue that understanding the evolutionary forces associated with interspecific interactions requires incorporation of a community framework, in which new interactions occur frequently. During their early phases, these newly established interactions are likely to drive fast evolution of both parties. We further argue that a more complete synthesis of Red Queen forces requires incorporation of the evolutionary conflicts within species that arise from sexual reproduction. Reciprocally, taking the Red Queen's perspective advances our understanding of the evolution of these intraspecific conflicts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据