4.7 Article

The excuse principle can maintain cooperation through forgivable defection in the Prisoner's Dilemma game

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1475

关键词

cooperation; reciprocal altruism; tit-for-tat; birds; Prisoner's Dilemma

资金

  1. Academy of Finland
  2. Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Latvia
  3. Science Council of Latvia
  4. Social Fund within the project 'Support for the implementation of doctoral studies at Daugavpils University' [2009/0140/1DP/1.1.2.1.2/09/IPIA/VIAA/015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reciprocal altruism describes a situation in which an organism acts in a manner that temporarily reduces its fitness while increasing another organism's fitness, but there is an ultimate fitness benefit based on an expectation that the other organism will act in a similar manner at a later time. It creates the obvious dilemma in which there is always a short-term benefit to cheating, therefore cooperating individuals must avoid being exploited by non-cooperating cheaters. This is achieved by following various decision rules, usually variants of the tit-for-tat (TFT) strategy. The strength of TFT, however, is also its weakness-mistakes in implementation or interpretation of moves, or the inability to cooperate, lead to a permanent breakdown in cooperation. We show that pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) use a TFT with an embedded 'excuse principle' to forgive the neighbours that were perceived as unable to cooperate during mobbing of predators. The excuse principle dramatically increases the stability of TFT-like behavioural strategies within the Prisoner's Dilemma game.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据