4.7 Article

Tool use by wild New Caledonian crows Corvus moneduloides at natural foraging sites

期刊

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1953

关键词

extractive foraging; social learning; tool use; Agrianome fairmairei; Aleurites moluccana; Corvus moneduloides

资金

  1. BBSRC [BB/C517392/1, BB/G023913/1]
  2. Rhodes Trust
  3. Linacre College
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/G023913/1, BB/C517392/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. BBSRC [BB/G023913/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New Caledonian crows Corvus moneduloides use tools made from sticks or leaf stems to 'fish' woodboring beetle larvae from their burrows in decaying wood. Previous research on this behaviour has been confined to baited sites, leaving its ecological context and significance virtually unexplored. To obtain detailed observations of natural, undisturbed tool use, we deployed motion-triggered video cameras at seven larva-fishing sites. From 1797 camera hours of surveillance over 111 days, we recorded 317 site visits by at least 14 individual crows. Tool use was observed during 150 site visits. Our video footage revealed notable variation in foraging success among identifiable crows. Two nutritionally independent, immature crows spent considerable time using tools, but were much less successful than local adults, highlighting the potential role of individual and social learning in the acquisition of tool-use proficiency. During systematic surveys of larva-fishing sites, we collected 193 tools that crows had left inserted in larva burrows. Comparing these tools with the holes in which they were found, and with raw materials available around logs, provides evidence for tool selectivity by New Caledonian crows under natural conditions. Taken together, these two complementary lines of investigation provide, to our knowledge, the first quantitative description of larva fishing by wild crows in its full ecological context.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据