4.7 Article

Ergatoid queen development in the ant Myrmecina nipponica: modular and heterochronic regulation of caste differentiation

期刊

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0142

关键词

caste development; heterochrony; imaginal primordia; modularity; social insect

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [20033002, 20370030, 21248005, 21677001]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20033002, 20370030, 22500250, 21248005] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Caste polyphenism in social insects provides us with excellent opportunities to examine the plasticity and robustness underlying developmental pathways. Several ant species have evolved unusual castes showing intermediate morphologies between alate queens and wingless workers. In some low-temperature habitats, the ant Myrmecina nipponica produces such intermediate reproductives (i.e. ergatoids), which can mate and store sperm but cannot fly. To gain insight into the developmental and evolutionary aspects associated with ergatoid production, we conducted morphological and histological examinations of the post-embryonic development of compound eyes, gonads and wings during the process of caste differentiation. In compound eyes, both the queen-worker and ergatoid-worker differences were already recognized at the third larval instar. In gonads, queen-worker differentiation began at the larval stage, and ergatoid-worker differentiation began between the prepupal and pupal stages. Wing development in ergatoids was generally similar to that in workers throughout post-embryonic development. Our results showed that the developmental rate and timing of differentiation in body parts differed among castes and among body parts. These differences suggest that the rearrangement of modular body parts by heterochronic developmental regulation is responsible for the origination of novel castes, which are considered to be adaptations to specific ecological niches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据