4.7 Article

Spatial and temporal extinction dynamics in a freshwater cetacean

期刊

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0584

关键词

Lipotes vexillifer; local ecological knowledge; optimal linear estimation; range collapse; time-series data; Yangtze River dolphin

资金

  1. Marine Mammal Commission
  2. Ocean Park Conservation Foundation Hong Kong
  3. People's Trust for Endangered Species
  4. EDGE
  5. NERC
  6. NERC [NE/D009456/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/D009456/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Geographical range contraction is a fundamental ecological characteristic of species population decline, but relatively little investigation has been conducted into general trends in the dynamic properties of range collapse. The Yangtze River dolphin or baiji (Lipotes vexillifer), probably the first large mammal species to have become extinct in over 50 years, was believed to have experienced major range collapse during its decline through progressive large-scale range contraction and fragmentation. This range-collapse model is challenged by a new dataset of 406 baiji last-sighting records collected from across the baiji's historical range during an interview survey of Yangtze fishing communities. Although baiji regional abundance may have varied across its range, analyses of the extensive new sighting series provide comprehensive evidence that baiji population decline was not associated with any major contraction in geographical range across the middle-lower Yangtze drainage, even in the decade immediately before probable global extinction of the species. Extinction risk in baiji was therefore seemingly not related to evidence of range collapse. Baiji apparently underwent large-scale periodic and seasonal movements across their range, and we propose that range contraction and fragmentation may not be general biogeographic characteristics for declining populations of mobile species in connected landscapes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据