4.7 Article

'Heritability' of dispersal propensity in a patchy population

期刊

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0454

关键词

assortative mating; between-patch dispersal; conditional dispersal; dispersal determinism; parent-offspring and sibling similarity; spatial constraints

资金

  1. CNRS [3054]
  2. National Research Agency [ANR-06-JCJC-0082]
  3. Swedish Research Council
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-06-JCJC-0082] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although dispersal is often considered to be a plastic, condition-dependent trait with low heritability, growing evidence supports medium to high levels of dispersal heritability. Obtaining unbiased estimates of dispersal heritability in natural populations nevertheless remains crucial to understand the evolution of dispersal strategies and their population consequences. Here we show that dispersal propensity (i.e. the probability of dispersal between habitat patches) displays a significant heritability in the collared flycatcher Ficedula albicollis, as estimated by within-family resemblance when accounting for environmental factors. Offspring of dispersing mothers or fathers had a higher propensity to disperse to a new habitat patch themselves. The effect of parental dispersal status was additional to that of local habitat quality, as measured by local breeding population size and success, confirming previous results about condition-dependent dispersal in this population. The estimated levels of heritability varied between 0.30+/-0.07 and 0.47+/-0.10, depending on parent-offspring comparisons made and correcting for a significant assortative mating with respect to dispersal status. Siblings also displayed a significant resemblance in dispersal propensity. These results suggest that variation in between-patch natal dispersal in the collared flycatcher is partly genetically determined, and we discuss ways to quantify this genetic basis and its implications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据